| Research and Instructional Services
Department University Libraries, Virginia Tech |
Student-Centered Assessment Tools:
3-2-1 Cards and the
similar 3 Stars and a Wish
Typical usage - End of class (4-6 minutes).
What is learned - Gives a basic sense of what students think they have
learned and what points are still confusing to them.
Advantages - Quick and easy to administer. Open style of questions allows
for flexibility in responses. Comments can be more helpful than numerical scores.
Potential disadvantages - Subjective. Can be hard to read the hand writing.
Some responses may not be related to the class and/or cover general things the instructor
can't control.
Contacts - Printed 3-2-1 cards may be obtained from Lori
Lee.
Attending Class Presentations
Typical usage - Going to class presentations where student's present
the results of their research.
What is learned - Gives a good sense of the full research process in
actual practice.
Advantages- At these presentations librarians can ask questions about student
research, learn more about how assignments were accomplished, find out what
the main challenges were, and possibly offer suggestions.
Potential disadvantages - Time consuming. Presentations may not all be
done all at once. Librarian need to be careful that any critiques that are given
do not negatively affect student grades.
Audience Response System
Typical usage - Uses wireless response keypads. Works in conjunction with Microsoft PowerPoint to allow students to pick an answer from a range of choices.
What is learned - Gives real-time feedback from participants.
Advantages- Helps keep students engaged. Instructor can tailor class session based on responses.
Potential disadvantages - Requires Turning Point software. Should do a quick practice run in advance of class to minimize the chance for technical glitches.
Contacts - Neal Henshaw
Customized Online Questionnaires
Typical usage - Time frame can vary from immediately after
class to several weeks later.
What is learned - Can tailor questionnaire to specific areas of interest
such as distance eduation.
Advantages - Students can answer questions without the professor present
and so may be more honest and forthcoming about any problems them had with the
assignment or their research. Questionnaire format is also convenient for all
involved and can be done at any time.
Potential disadvantages - Some dislike questionnaires or won't want to
spend the time so response rate may be low.
Contacts - Dave Beagle
Focus Groups
Typical usage - Have a sample of students from a particular class
come in to be interviewed by library staff not involved with the teaching of
the class. Best done with two people, one to do the interview and the other
to take notes or tape comments.
What is learned - Can find out what students really thought of the session
and the usefulness of the information covered.
Advantages - You can ask questions that really get at learning outcomes.
Responses will often be more honest with neither the professor nor the librarian(s)
there.
Potential Disadvantages - Labor intensive. May be hard to get a representative
sample. If done for extra credit you often get a skewed population made up of
disgruntled students who badly need more points along with a few overachievers.
You may need incentives to attract students to come (refreshments, small prizes,
etc.) Everyone should be given a chance to participate otherwise a few people
may dominate.
Contacts - Caryl Gray, Bruce
Pencek
Follow-Up Interviews with Classes
Typical usage - Near the end of semester, after they have
completed their research.
What is learned - Can find out how the students were able to apply the
resources covered to their information needs.
Advantages - You can ask questions that really get at learning outcomes.
Professors can hear for themselves during the interviews what the problems were
and can collaborate to improve things in the future.
Potential Disadvantages - Interviews really need two people: one to do
the interviewing and the other to take notes or tape comments. Students are
not always forthcoming with the professor present or with the instructors who
taught the library session(s) there. Note - if questions are focused on students,
and not on the how well the instructor taught, this isn't as great a problem
as one might expect.
Contacts - Bruce Pencek
Quick Assignments
Typical usage - End of class (5-7 minutes).
What is learned - Gives a reliable indication of whether students have
mastered the points covered on the assignment.
Advantages - Quick and easy to administer. Not relying on subjective
assessment. Let's you know right away if students really "get it"
or not.
Potential Disadvantages - Must be limited to something simple that can
be completed in the time available.
Teaching Portfolio
Typical usage - Formal self-evaluation process. Compiled over an extended
period of time.
What is learned - Review of instructional methods, philosophy, goals,
and effectiveness.
Advantages - Very thorough. Documentation may be helpful to demonstrate
productivity for internal reviews or for external marketing.
Disadvantages - Requires commitment of considerable time and effort.
Must be brutally honest to be most effective.
Special notes - The book "The Teaching Portfolio: A Practical Guide
to Improved Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions" (LB2333 S46 1997)
offers a good overview and includes helpful examples (especially p.70-77).
Web Survey - New for Fall 2008!
Typical usage - End of class (5-7 minutes)
What is learned - Incorporates primary elements of the 3-2-1 cards. Also includes evaluation of the pace and usefulness of the session.
Advantages - Quick and easy to administer. Open style of questions allows
for flexibility in responses. High response rate.
Disadvantages - Some responses may not be related to the class and/or cover general things the instructor
can't control.
Special notes - Preferred form of evaluation if using one of the library classrooms.
Contacts - Carolyn Meier
Return to the main clearinghouse page
Send comments, suggestions, and additions to Ed
Lener
Last Updated September 1, 2008